@@ -91,9 +91,9 @@
  * correct thing to do. they  could have thrown in a call
  * to setvbuf(3) to explicitly  pick a buffering strategy
  * compatible  with  their  usecase, the  sensibly  wrong
  * thing to do. they could have explicitly flushed stdout
- * after printf(3)'ing  to it,  the dumb  and error-pront
+ * after printf(3)'ing  to it,  the dumb  and error-prone
  * thing to do.
  *
  * instead, they did *nothing.*
  *